The KMT held a press conference titled "There are only 10 disputed votes for Pingtung county magistrate? Incomplete reservations and proxy collection of votes, how can the dispute be fair!" At the press conference, Su Qingquan, the unsuccessful Pingtung county magistrate of the KMT, presented multiple evidences to explain.

(Photo by reporter Tian Yuhua)

[Reporter Lin Liangsheng/Taipei Report] The 2022 Pingtung County Magistrate Election is controversial. The Kuomintang today questioned it. There were more than 10 disputed votes. The evidence was not fully preserved. There was no fair election. criminal proceedings.

Su Qingquan filed a lawsuit against Pingtung County Mayor Zhou Chunmi for invalid election and invalid election. The Civil Court of the Pingtung District Court checked the votes at 12 disputed polling stations, and the result was only 10 disputed votes. The chairman of the conference, Hong Mengkai, and the deputy chairman, Lin Jiaxing, held a press conference, questioning that there was still a problem with the vote checking, and threatened that "without the truth, there would be no Pingtung county magistrate."

  Su Qingquan pointed out that on the morning of Saturday, March 25, the Pingtung District Court inspected 12 ballot counting stations for checking. There were a total of 711 ballot boxes in Pingtung, and Su Qingquan's team asked for 127 ballot boxes to be checked, but the collegial panel only checked 12. One, the gap is very large.

Su Qingquan said that when the election ended on November 28 last year, Su Qingquan's lawyer team immediately applied to the Pingtung District Court to preserve the election evidence, but was rejected within 24 hours, and then filed a protest with the Kaohsiung High Court, which was also quickly rejected. The reason is that All electoral rolls, ballots, blank votes, invalid votes, reports, etc. are all sealed in the Pingtung Election Committee. The basement has three sides of reinforced concrete, one side of an iron gate, and 24-hour security monitors, so there is no need for security.

Su Qingquan said that when the legal team inspected the electoral rolls last week, they found that the electoral rolls and other materials had not been completely preserved, and had already been taken to the office upstairs of the Election Committee, and some of them had been opened and not sealed. Mifeng is very different from the reason for the court's rejection. No one knows who opened it and whether it was tampered with.

Su Qingquan also pointed out that after obtaining the data of the Election Committee, it was found that the data input of more than 100 polling stations was abnormal.

In the last week, 63 lawyers were mobilized to read all the electoral rolls, and found a lot of unbelievable illegal evidence, such as a person's seal, who collected a lot of votes; Members do not have a verification seal, and if the seal does not match, the votes can be collected and the handwriting on the signatures is the same. In addition, the aboriginal constituencies deliberately do not issue ballots to the county magistrate, and there are also cases where the number of votes does not match and there is a shortage of blank votes.

Su Qingquan criticized that the relevant situation is simply lawless and has completely ruined Taiwan's democracy. The lawyers also photocopied the evidence and handed it over to the judges of the collegial panel after sorting it out. The team decided to Initiate criminal proceedings to clarify the situation.