Four scholars, Guo Lixin, Lu Qianyi, Fu Dawei, and Feng Jiansan (from left) held a press conference on "Peace, Anti-Arms, Self-Determination, and Emphasis on Climate" on the 20th.

(file photo)

For related news, please see: "Anti-war" scholars: Russia's attack on Ukraine is the United States' provocation of Taiwan Strait tensions, and the United States should bear the greatest responsibility

[Instant News/Comprehensive Report] In recent years, the CCP has been constantly intimidating and attacking Taiwan. Some people in the country firmly oppose and protect democracy, but there are also voices seeking peace in the name of anti-war.

Recently, a number of scholars in Taiwan established the "Taiwan Anti-War Statement Working Group" and held a press conference. One of their appeals is that the government should focus the national budget on people's livelihood, social welfare and climate mitigation, rather than investing in military purchases.

In this regard, environmental protection lawyer and former deputy director of the Environmental Protection Agency of the Executive Yuan, Zhan Shungui, said bluntly, leaving aside the silence of China, the response of this group of scholars at the press conference can only be that "the ugliness is fully exposed"!

Please read on...

Yangming Jiaotong University retired professor Fu Dawei, National Chengchi University (retired) adjunct professor Guo Lixin, National Chengchi University professor Feng Jiansan, researcher Lu Qianyi of the Academia Sinica and other scholars established the "Taiwan Anti-War Statement Working Group". The press conference on the importance of the climate, put forward "Ukraine peace: ceasefire negotiations, do not escalate conflicts", "stop U.S. militarism and economic sanctions", "no war between the United States and China, Taiwan should be independent and maintain friendly and equidistant relations with major powers", "National The budget should be used for people's livelihood, social welfare and climate mitigation instead of going into war and military force." These are the four major demands.

During the entire press conference, four scholars claimed that the United States was the chief culprit for the Ukrainian-Russian war and the rising tension in the Taiwan Strait, accusing the United States of launching military operations overseas in the name of anti-terrorism for many years, and that it was the number one international threat.

They also said that it is the United States that is really resisting China now, and China stands up to resist because it feels threatened, and Taiwan should not dance with the United States.

In addition, in response to Taiwan's active procurement of military weapons in recent years to enhance self-defense capabilities, 4 scholars called for the money to be used to develop people's livelihood, social welfare and climate countermeasures.

4 Scholars' statement of summation and anti-war caused criticism from the outside world.

Zhan Shungui today (22nd) also ridiculed through Facebook: "Based on the past demeanor and academic performance of Fu, Guo, and Feng, after watching it, I only feel that they are old men, and they don't have to be ambitious. During the three referendums, she turned out to amplify the impact of natural gas on global warming and became a laughing stock. Later, the four of them held a press conference and faced questions from reporters, but they were poor at words, logical, and evasive, showing their ugliness. , and it is seriously out of touch with society (especially the media ecology)!"

Zhan Shungui went on to say that the arguments put forward by these four scholars "not only did not clarify the doubts of the outside world, but they were actually full of prejudice and deliberately shielded the ridicule of Russia and China, which only made people feel that these poor old men were completely incontinent. , but also reluctantly come out to wrinkle a pool of spring water, why bother? Afterwards, the interviews and book submissions respectively revealed that the logic is not logical, the value concept is unspeakable, and it is nothing but more laughing stock.”