32nd SEA Games, the first SEA Games in history in Cambodia Will host the competition between 5-17 May, there will be many issues. which I don't know if it's an "issue" specific to Thailand or members
But the image that came out is similar to having a reaction to
Thailand stands out in particular.
I don't know if he thinks, we think or different people think differently.
think both
From "Kun Khmer" Khmer boxing, added another kind of "Kun Bogator", another of his ancient martial arts.
packaged
It comes to the issue of broadcasting rights that are still unreasonable.
It seems to be quite a lot of emotion.
If looking back at the history of the SEA Games that have been recorded
Cambodia used to host the 3rd Golden Cape in 1963 or 1963 in Phnom Penh.
which Laemthong sport
Later, the name was changed to "Sea Games" from 1977 onwards, and the Golden Laem Thong sport at that time.
Finally, Cambodia did not organize as scheduled.
because there is a dispute over the Temple Mount with Thailand
Making it another 2 years later, Malaysia hosted the event in Kuala Lumpur in 1965, so it was the 3rd Golden Peninsula sport.
would understand that
What does this SEA Games mean to Cambodia?
His hosting is therefore fully devoted.
And when you are very determined
naturally had high expectations
But sport is about sport.
Don't let it become anything else!
Talking about the copyright of the SEA Games
It's better than full about us, no matter what the final price will be.
From the first set that the host offered for sale, $ 800,000, or about 28 million baht, with the Sports Authority of Thailand negotiating.
and framing must not be much different from the original
What price? That price is one thing.
but equal to
This time buying sports licenses
Especially sports that are in the group "Must Have" defined by the NBTC.
The Sports Authority of Thailand must be the host every time, every game!!!
In addition, it was pointed out that if the SAT has a private sector to support the purchase of copyrights
must spread the transmission
Give rights to operators of TV stations and other platforms.
according to the must have rule too
That means when there is a "purchase", no matter how SAT buys, is there someone joining in?
must be distributed according to the must have rule
Monopoly cannot be restricted.
On the other hand, if there is no “buying”, it is not illegal.
with no requirements
From now on, sports that are in the network "Musthave", Thai people will only be able to watch from the purchase of SAT like that, right?
Likewise, if Thai people don't watch it, is it because SAT doesn't buy it?
Then the NBTC, who has played an important role in creating issues that Thai people have seen or not watched, is not bound by anything either in "paying" or acquiring copyright.
This is the main work of
Has the SAT already gone?
"Negative pawns"