The judge of the summary court stated that the husband and wife had reached a settlement, and the husband could no longer seek compensation from the cheating wife. As for Xiao Wang, although the judge Wu Jiahua ruled that the third party should not be compensated in another case, the case refused to pay compensation, but the trial judge still believed that Xiao Wang violated the rights of the spouse. Awarded compensation of 150,000 yuan.

(file photo)

[Reporter Wen Yude/Taipei Report] A husband claimed 1 million yuan from his wife and Xiao Wang; the wife refused to pay the compensation in the letter of guarantee signed by the husband and wife, and Xiao Wang brought up two cases in which the judge Wu Jiahua of the Taipei District Court ruled that the third party should not be compensated , also refused compensation.

The judge of the Taipei Simple Court issued a letter of guarantee stating that the husband and wife had reached a settlement, and the husband could no longer claim compensation from his wife; he also refused to reject Xiao Wang's defense, affirming that the spouse's rights had been violated, and the husband was awarded 150,000 yuan in compensation; an appeal is possible.

The couple got married in 2011. The husband said that the family was originally happy and envied by both men and gods. Unexpectedly, his wife often quarreled with excuses from 2022. After he became suspicious, he found that his wife had maintained close contact with her ex-boyfriend surnamed Peng. The interaction even surpassed As an ordinary friend, he learned that he had been cheated for many years, and claimed 300,000 yuan from his wife and Xiao Wang.

Please read on...

The wife submitted a letter of guarantee signed by the husband and wife, refusing to pay compensation.

Xiao Wang cited two cases in which the judge Wu Jiahua ruled that the third party should not be compensated, and argued that the husband should not sue on the grounds that the rights of the spouse had been violated; moreover, the husband’s illegal intrusion into the screenshot of the e-mail had violated the right of privacy and should not be used as evidence.

The simple court pointed out that according to the letter of guarantee signed by the husband and wife in September 2022, the husband agreed to withdraw the civil complaint against the wife, and the wife also agreed to withdraw the criminal crime of obstructing the use of computers brought against the husband, and the husband and wife also agreed not to request any civil lawsuits related to this case. Claimed and agreed to a divorce; this letter of guarantee has legal effect, since the husband agreed to abandon the lawsuit against the wife, the case cannot be filed again.

The simple court also learned from the emails of his wife and Xiao Wang that the two had exchanged messages such as: "I will love you the same, no change", "Email letters must be deleted, spam and backups must be deleted", "Will you stick to your feelings for me? I really love you much more than you imagined", "I'm going to divorce first, I won't regret it, I regretted it 15 years ago", and it was determined that Xiao Wang violated the right of spouse.

The Simple Tribunal further stated that in the Interpretation No. 791 of the Interpretation declaring the crime of adultery exonerated, according to part of the co-opinion submitted by Justice Huang Hongxia, it can be known that the duty of loyalty between husband and wife is one of the legal interests protected by the tort provisions of the civil law. It did not violate the "freedom of speech" and "right to self-determination of sexuality" guaranteed by the Constitution, and Xiao Wang refused to reply.

As for the reason why the husband entered the e-mail box to check e-mails, it was to maintain the marriage of the husband and wife. The simple court case determined that the husband’s means and purposes did not exceed the principle of proportionality. The evidence of the conversation was considered, and the academic experience of the husband and Xiao Wang was considered. , sentenced Xiao Wang to pay 150,000 yuan in compensation.