The woman who scavenged waste took 2 strings of toilet paper (red circle) to settle the settlement for 180,000 yuan, and the owner asked for a further compensation of 3.59 million yuan and asked for an apology published in the newspaper.

(file photo)

Li Nv choked "I'll keep you locked up for five years" and was involved in intimidation to get money

[Reporter Huang Liangjie/Kaohsiung Report] A woman surnamed Lin in Kaohsiung took two strings of toilet paper from a woman surnamed Li’s locomotive. Li called the police and demanded 100 times the compensation and 100,000 yuan in "legal consultant fees". A settlement of 80,000 yuan was settled, and the woman who scavenged waste was fined 1,000 yuan and exempted from going to prison; the incident of compensation for two strings of toilet paper at a sky-high price of 180,000 yuan was not over yet, and the woman who scavenged waste told Li that "you will be imprisoned for five years", involving intimidation Taking money led to Li Nv being sentenced to one year in prison. Li Nv was dissatisfied and then sued the scavenger woman for compensation of 3.592 million yuan. The Kaohsiung District Court ruled that the scavenger woman won the lawsuit without compensation.

Scavengers fined 1,000 yuan and not sent to jail

In the early morning of August 2009, Lin Nv (65 years old), a waste picker, saw two strings of toilet paper (market price: 798 yuan) on the locomotive outside Li Nv’s house in Fengshan District. Lin Nv mistook the two strings for recycling The toilet paper was taken away, and the victim Li Nv found out that it was stolen and called the police. The police checked the monitors and found that Lin Nv was involved in the case. She was notified by the police and returned Li Nv with two strings of toilet paper. The two reconciled, and Li Nv demanded 100 times the compensation .

Please read on...

Mrs. Lin remitted the compensation of 79,800 yuan to Ms. Li on the same day, and Ms. Li asked Mrs. Lin to pay another 100,000 yuan for "legal consultant fees". eight yuan.

Considering that the two settled with 180,000 yuan, the judge sentenced them to a fine of 1,000 yuan and a two-year probation for theft.

Suspecting that she had been extorted afterward, the woman who scavenged the trash filed a lawsuit against Ms. Li, accusing her of threatening "if you don't pay 100,000 yuan, you will never reconcile and forgive you, and you will be imprisoned for five years"; Ms. Li argued that because of the settlement Only then did the scavenger get a light sentence, but she denied the threat and was sentenced to one year in prison instead.

Ms. Li was dissatisfied with being the victim of the theft and was sued by the thieves. In addition to appealing the theft, she believed that she was framed by the thieves and filed a criminal and civil compensation lawsuit. She claimed 3,592,000 from Mrs. Lin ○○ yuan, and at the same time demanded that an apology notice be published on the front pages of newspapers across the country for three days.

The Kaohsiung District Court concluded that the scavenger woman did not constitute a "framed accusation" and sentenced her to lose the case. The appeal of the theft case was also rejected.