The man was accused of sexual assault by his girlfriend and claimed 3 million yuan; the judge believed that there was no evidence of sexual assault by the man and sentenced his girlfriend to lose the lawsuit.

(Situation photo)

[Reporter Wen Yude/Taipei Report] A man was accused of sexual assault twice in the same day by his girlfriend who was studying in supplementary school, and demanded 3 million yuan in compensation.

During the court trial, the girlfriend used LINE conversations and pregnancy test records as evidence, and asked the judge to investigate the man’s marriage and the birth dates of the three children to prove that the man was a repeat rapist; but the judge believed that there was no evidence of the man’s sexual assault, and the girlfriend lost the case , may appeal.

The girlfriend said that on June 12, 2020, in spite of her resistance and struggle, the man forcibly took off her inner and outer pants and sexually assaulted her. On the same day at around 3 or 4 pm, the man drove her to Jiantan. In a small house near the scenic area, she was raped twice; the two sexual assaults caused her waist injury and serious mental trauma, and she claimed 3 million yuan.

Please read on...

The man did not deny that he had sex during the couple's relationship, but he did not have sex with his girlfriend on June 12. Later, when he went to Jiantan Scenic Area, he only patted his girlfriend's back and denied liability for compensation.

During the court hearing, the girlfriend used LINE conversation records as evidence to prove that she had been sexually assaulted. Uncomfortable, self-confinement” and other words; but the judge pointed out that these conversations have no way of knowing whether the girlfriend’s injuries were caused by the man’s sexual assault.

What's more, when my girlfriend went to the Chinese medicine clinic later, she mentioned that she was injured due to sports on June 12, which caused more pain in her spine. However, her girlfriend claimed in court that the injury was caused by a man's sexual assault. Therefore, the judge believed that the man could not be identified based on LINE conversations. sexual assault.

As for the girlfriend's request to investigate the pregnancy test records to prove that the man sexually assaulted her without a condom, she also requested to investigate the man's marriage records and the birth dates of the three children to prove that the man is a repeat rapist; the judge stated that the reason for the late menstruation may be There are many reasons, and it cannot be presumed that it was caused by the sexual assault of the man. Furthermore, whether the man has ever been married, whether he has children, etc. has nothing to do with whether he has sexually assaulted others.

The judge also learned from the statement of the committee members who assisted the two parties in the mediation that the couples were arguing very loudly during the mediation, but the committee members "should" have not heard the girlfriend mention the sexual assault to the man, nor did they hear the girlfriend accuse the man of sexual assault; therefore, they did not It was determined that the man had sexually assaulted, and there was no recording during the mediation, so it was impossible to prove that the girlfriend mentioned sexual assault during the mediation, and the girlfriend was finally sentenced to lose.