New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office.

(file photo)

[Reporter Wang Dingchuan/New Taipei Report] A man surnamed Huang claimed to be attacked, chased and bitten by a "rabbit" when he reached the top floor of his home. Huang’s injuries were slender scars, not animal tooth marks, and he claimed to have kicked the rabbit away. It cannot be ruled out that he drove the rabbit away or was accidentally scratched by other objects when he left. The evidence is insufficient and he will not prosecute.

Huang Nan filed a lawsuit pointing out that at about 6 a.m. on May 7, 2021, he went up to the top floor of his house, but was attacked, chased and bitten by a rabbit raised by Chen, which caused his right foot to be torn. suspect.

Please read on...

Chen insisted that rabbits are pets kept by children. They were kept on the top floor to give the rabbits space to move around. They usually let the rabbits out for activities. On the day of the crime, they just forgot to lock the rabbits back, but the rabbits usually only run around people. It runs around and doesn't bite people. I don't know if the rabbit has attacked Huang Nan.

According to the investigation by the prosecution, although there is a record in the doctor's order column of the clinic's injury examination form: "The injury was caused by being bitten by a rabbit", but after consulting the clinic, the clinic replied that based on the doctor-patient relationship, it is usually recorded according to the patient's description, and the photo of Huang's injury It was a slender scar, not an animal tooth mark. In addition, he claimed to have kicked the rabbit away at that time. It cannot be ruled out that he drove the rabbit away or was accidentally scratched by something else when he left. Therefore, no prosecution will be prosecuted.