Wu Yinong was interviewed by the media before going to the Zhongshan market to sweep the streets in the morning. He was asked that Wang Hongwei has expressed his political opinions. Do you want to answer the post for the continued debate?

Wu Yinong said that the debate is to have specific propositions and criticisms for substantive political opinions, and what Wang Hongwei has seen from the election to today is only slobber and abuse.

(Photographed by reporter Luo Peide)

[Reporter Shi Xiaoguang/Taipei Report] Lin Jiaxing, deputy chairman of the Kuomintang Cultural Communication Association, questioned today that Wu Yinong, a by-election candidate for the Taipei City Council of the Democratic Progressive Party, did not respond positively to whether he was debating with his opponent, Kuomintang candidate Wang Hongwei. and abuse, but turned a blind eye to criticism, suggestions and questions from the king and the public, and did not even have the courage to defend his own political views. How can such a "cowardly" act make the outside world expect to defend the country?

Wu Yinong was interviewed by the media before going to the Zhongshan market to sweep the streets in the morning. He was asked that Wang Hongwei has expressed his political opinions. Do you want to answer the post for the continued debate?

Wu Yinong said that the debate is to have specific propositions and criticisms for substantive political opinions. From the election to today, Wang Hongwei has only seen slobber and abuse. Compared with his specific political opinions, what is the meaning of the other party's saliva?

Please read on...

Lin Jiaxing pointed out that Wang Hongwei put forward a number of substantive political opinions, including the "four major supervisions" against Premier Su Zhenchang, Director of National Security Chen Mingtong, Hsinchu Science and Technology Management Bureau and NCC, postponement of the second and third nuclear tests, prohibiting the government from tying the media, paying taxes to the people, The social safety net and public affairs are all more political opinions. Wu Yinong once criticized a lot, but in the face of debate posts, he only responded "I didn't see the specific proposition" and was always timid and evasive. Is it because Wu Yinong has Self-knowledge, not confident in the political opinions you have rashly put forward?

Lin Jiaxing said that the debate is not a war of words. It allows both sides to really come up with plans and data, so that voters can have more information to judge candidates. It is also a way of dialogue with the society. Policy dialogue, but Wu either avoided the important and ignored the minor, or kept silent. He even pretended not to hear the media's questions about the debate, causing the outside world to shake their heads.

Lin Jiaxing emphasized that as a legislator, he often needs to supervise and question the administrative agency with specific data and materials. To some extent, it is like debating with the administrative agency. If Wu Yinong can't even debate with his opponents in the election campaign, how can voters trust him? Capable of fighting for the welfare of the people and monitoring the government in the halls of Congress?