Listen to the news

There should be no talk of a third term before the first and second are exhausted.

However, consistency in work is important.

For us, it does not matter to whom the third term will go, we will participate in the talks constructively.

This is what the leader of "Bulgarian Rise" Stefan Yanev said in an interview for the program "More from the Day".

By decree of President Rumen Radev dated May 12, 2021, Stefan Yanev was appointed acting. 

"For us as a parliamentary group, as a new party, participation in political life is not to seek positions. We are looking for the implementation of policies and solutions. We do not set conditions for mandatory participation in a cabinet. It is more important what policies and mechanisms this cabinet will provide ", he clarified.

The leader of "Bulgarian Rise" also commented on what, in his opinion, the minimum wage should be.

"Possibly higher is better. The reasoning is how much the state can afford. It has to be linked to a clear rationale and what would be the revenues in the budget so that this minimum wage can be guaranteed. Without it is clear how it will affect the budget, it creates difficulties for a future regular cabinet," Yanev pointed out, adding that there must be an understanding between the parties in order to produce a regular government that will propose a budget.

"Then the issue of the minimum wage will be easier to solve," he believes.

This is the minimum wage offered by the Cabinet from next year

Stefan Yanev

With the decree of the President Rumen Radev of May 12, 2021, Stefan Yanev was appointed official. He emphasized that "Bulgarian Rise" believes that a possible regular government should be formed on the basis of a coalition agreement.

Thus, according to him, it will be clear on whose shoulders the political responsibility falls. 

Yanev stated that they do not support a law that is focused solely on the personality of the chief prosecutor, in this case Ivan Geshev.

"The control over the chief prosecutor - we are not opposed to having one, but this should not be the construction of legislation for one person, which contradicts the Constitution. Comprehensive legal and judicial reform - yes. Not specific legislation for a specific person," he explained.

Paper ballot and Radev's veto: we are for machine voting, we are not against paper if it is combined with a machine that deletes paper ballots 

Stefan Yanev