A man was suspected of violating the protection order and harassing his girlfriend. He nodded and went to the pearl together before uploading a message in the group to accuse his girlfriend of being a bead. Now he is accused of obstructing freedom. The Tainan District Court sentenced him to 30 days of detention.

(File photo, photo by reporter Wang Jie)

[Reporter Wang Jie/Tainan Report] A man applied for a protection order because his ex-girlfriend was subjected to domestic violence, and he clearly cannot harass her. However, A man uploaded a message in the LINE group with his girlfriend, questioning why he was sued for obstructing freedom?

He also said that at the beginning he said he was going to "enter the Pearl", and the other party agreed. He had evidence to prove that it was his girlfriend who wanted to "enter the Pearl" together; but the woman saw the message and felt that the message from the man A was harassing, so she sued for violating the protection order; Tainan The district court sentenced male A to 30 days of detention.

It is understood that man A beat his girlfriend with slippers, so he was considered domestic violence, so his girlfriend applied for a protection order, stipulating that man A cannot harass, contact, follow and communicate with his girlfriend. However, in May this year, man A was with his girlfriend In the common group of , asked by name why his girlfriend sued for obstructing freedom?

When he was going to "enter the Pearl", his girlfriend also said that he wanted to go together. How could it be that he is obstructing freedom now?

Please read on...

After his girlfriend filed a lawsuit against male A for violating the protection order, male A argued that he did not send messages to harass his girlfriend, but that he was still another girlfriend’s best friend in this 3-person group, and his girlfriend had already blocked him and could not see him Sending a message, so he was talking to his girlfriend and best friend. He hoped that people were doing it and the sky was watching. There was no intention of intimidation, and after he said that, he also quit the group.

But the girlfriend took out the screenshots, thinking that man A was going to pass this message to her, and then said in the group, the judge analyzed literally, and man A's argument was unacceptable, so he was sentenced to 30 days of criminal detention.

☆In case of violence in a cohabitation relationship, the public can call the 113 protection hotline, or seek help from the domestic violence prevention centers of local governments.