Regarding the defeat of the DPP in the 9-in-1 election, Li Wenzhong, the vice-chairman of the Retirement Committee, said yesterday that he would attack the opponent Heijin, but we often have a member of the Standing Committee of the Mafia in the Central Committee, so "can we win people's trust?" (data photo)

[Reporter Tu Jumin/Taipei Report] The DPP lost in the 9-in-1 election. Li Wenzhong, vice chairman of the DPP’s Retirement Association, expressed his views in an internal group yesterday. In addition to calling on the DPP not to review voters, it is not a struggle or finding In addition to war criminals, he also pointed out that the DPP "throws the party's value aside and loses its moral height." Member of the Standing Committee", so "Can you win people's trust?"

Li Wenzhong expressed his views on the results of the general election in an internal group yesterday. He pointed out that the support and trust of the Tsai government are both 50%, and the support of the Democratic Progressive Party is also higher than that of the KMT by 10%. "The loss is beyond our expectations. In addition, although there were warning signs in advance, there was no vigilance.”

Relevant reviews are aimed at the government, political parties and political workers, and will not review voters. "The lessons conveyed by voters are so severe. We didn't grasp the clues before the election. After the election, we can't even understand how we lost, or we can't respond in good faith." And self-examination is to explore, dialogue, and attack mistakes, so as to encourage them, not to fight or find war criminals.

Please read on...

The Criticism of the Party's Proud Thesis Made a Mistake

Li Wenzhong said, "(People) often feel that the ruling party has become proud." The support of the DPP has increased in the past 20 years. There should be no suspense in the situation, but he has been caught in a hard fight, which puzzles him.

He mentioned that it was not wrong for them to defend the epidemic prevention in the past, but if they start from the current situation and feelings of the people, the explanation may be softer, and the difficulties and assistance to all walks of life will be closer to the needs of practitioners. If we pay attention to this point early , maybe try to create issues instead of getting stuck in the quagmire of epidemic prevention.

Regarding the thesis case of former Hsinchu Mayor Lin Zhijian, Li Wenzhong believes that Lin Zhijian made a mistake and was very wronged. When the National Taiwan University Ethics Association made a resolution to revoke Lin Zhijian's master's degree, Tsai Ing-wen, then chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party, ordered the entire party to support him and directly contacted National Taiwan University. The "collision" disappointed intellectuals, voters, and young people. Since then, it has reversed from Keelung to Hsinchu.

Li Wenzhong also said that the dissertation is an issue of academic ethics value, and the DPP's handling of the Lin Zhijian case made it immoral in its subsequent attacks on Zhang Shanzheng, who was running for the mayor of Taoyuan, Gao Hongan, who was running for the mayor of Hsinchu, and Xu Shuhua, who was running for the mayor of Nantou County Height, there is only the offense and defense left in the election. "To give another example, in Miaoli, Nantou and other places we attack black money, but we often have a member of the Standing Committee of the underworld in China." Although it can be argued that it was a long time ago, most Mafia legislators, speakers, councilors, township chiefs, representatives also, but this time the target of the attack also included Xu Shuhua's father, "Can we gain people's trust by attacking the underworld?"

Li Wenzhong said that another more important issue is the nomination. In this campaign, only the Pingtung County primary election is left. Although he knows that the Party Central Committee uses polls as a basis for coordination, he hopes to avoid excessive fighting within the party. The price is the loss of democracy. "May I ask how the conflicts and divisions in the primary election affected the victory? What have you gained by becoming a quasi-speaking party? What have you lost?"