Lin Zhoumin, former director of Metropolitan Development Bureau of the Taipei City Government, was interviewed by the Free Times program "What's the matter with me?" He raised many public security concerns at the Taipei Arena.

(Photo by reporter Zhang Jiarui)

Former Director of Metropolitan Development Bureau approves loose review, which has never been seen in the world City Hall: The review process is open and transparent

[Reporter Zheng Mingxiang/Taipei Report] The tragedy of the Itaewon stampede in South Korea shocked the world, and it also made Taiwanese society focus on the public security issue of the Taipei Arena again; ○In 1919, the inspection was passed with loose standards and more than half of the committee members left the meeting. This is unprecedented in the world. Li Wenzong, the former director of the mayor's office who criticized Mayor Ke Wenzhe, was like a "representative of Farglory in the North City Hall", openly Pressing censorship is the most obvious example of undermining Taiwan's civil service system; Lin appealed for a "make-up test" for the censorship at the Big Egg, and promised to re-examine the overall public security for the Democratic Progressive Party's Taipei mayoral candidate Chen Shizhong and the Kuomintang candidate Jiang Wan'an. affim.

Please read on...

Beishi Government: It is not true that half of the committee members left the meeting

The reporter called Li Wenzong several times but failed to get through; Chen Zhihan, the spokesperson of the Beishi government, said that the deliberation process was open and transparent, and it was not true that half of the committee members left the meeting. Agreed, "The relevant expert committee members in Taiwan are not only the former Director Lin."

Only two of the six computer simulations for escape and refuge

In an exclusive interview with this newspaper's "What's the matter with me?", Lin Zhoumin said that the dome escape should go through six computer simulations, but the North City Government only did two, and the other four were "too strict and unreasonable" Skip it for reasons, and criticize that no disaster prevention and evacuation simulation in any public place in the world has passed such a standard; in addition, the outdoor accommodation space is insufficient and has not been clearly deliberated.

"Illusion passed" Lin: Absolutely unacceptable

Lin Zhoumin also showed the scene of the critical urban review meeting on October 14, 2019 and his speech verbatim, alleging that five committee members clearly advocated that the computer simulation of escape and refuge should be redone, and the semi-outdoor refuge accommodation space should be re-examined. Going to the general meeting for review, and at the end of the meeting, many members left the meeting by themselves, and the crowd continued to protest. The chairman still announced that the case was approved. unacceptable".

Li Wenzong, the former director of the mayor's office, openly pressured to censor

Lin Zhoumin also directly pointed out that Li Wenzong, the chairman of Beijie, who was the director of the mayor's office at the time, was like a "representative of Farglory Company in Beijing Municipal Government" who played a guiding game for the deliberation. This is the most obvious example of undermining Taiwan's civil service system. Ke Wenzhe, do you agree with Li Wenzong's approach?

For this unreasonable process, is it in line with the scientific spirit?

"I don't believe you would agree."

Chen and Jiang promised to conduct a comprehensive review of Lin Affirm

Lin Zhoumin described that the Big Arena is like a student who has not passed the exam but can obtain a diploma. He should complete the "make-up exam and pass" and asked the candidates for mayor.

Chen Shizhong said that he would convene disaster prevention experts to conduct a comprehensive review; Jiang Wan'an promised that the stadium would only be allowed to open after a complete simulation test and review; non-party candidate Huang Shanshan believed that the issues raised by Lin Zhoumin had been reviewed and passed, and it will not be used until now. I don't know why I mentioned it.

The big arena is by no means just considering commercial profits

Lin Zhoumin affirmed Chen Shizhong and Jiang Wan'an's promise to restart the review of the overall public security, but for Huang Shanshan's statement, Lin believed that the big stadium passed the metropolitan trial before Huang Shanshan became the deputy mayor, and questioned how much Huang knew about this matter, emphasizing the big big egg case It is by no means just considering favorable commercial profits.

Chen Zhihan said that in the past, the Beishi government actively guided Farglory to not follow the plans for construction, which greatly improved the fireproof and evacuation facilities of the big arena. However, Lin Zhoumin misled the audience with biased information and deliberately catered to specific candidates, questioning whether it was a professional discussion or an election. operate.