The public filed a petition requesting confirmation of the invalidity of the Laizhu referendum. Beigaohang believed that the parties were unqualified, and the judgment was dismissed.
[Reporter Wen Yude/Taipei Report] Last year, the number of "disagree" votes in the Lai pig referendum was higher than "agree". Others believed that "small meat essence" was a drug and should not be added to animal feed at all. They filed an administrative lawsuit to confirm the referendum. The result was invalid. The Taipei High Administrative Court pointed out that according to the law, only the prosecutor and the leader of the referendum proposer can initiate a lawsuit for confirmation of invalidity. Therefore, the public is not eligible and the ruling is dismissed.
The Central Election Commission announced on May 14 last year that the 18th case of the nationwide referendum was established. Products?” After a vote on December 18, the result was that the citizens’ proposal was not passed.
Please read on...
Some people believe that "small meat extract" is a medicine and should not be added to animal feed at all. Otherwise, long-term consumption of meat containing "small meat extract" will cause long-term physical damage to the people and cannot be recovered.
The people also said that in order to protect the health of the people, the government should ban the use of clenbuterol, and that health and life are basic human rights that cannot be exchanged for any so-called "economic interests". Therefore, even "referendum consent" is unconstitutional and invalid. A request to confirm the referendum result is invalid.
The Central Election Commission explained that the people who filed the complaint were not the leader of the referendum proposer, and the parties were ineligible and should be dismissed.
Beigaohang pointed out that according to the referendum law, only the prosecutor and the leader of the referendum proposer can file a lawsuit for confirmation of invalidity when they find that the referendum is invalid, the referendum case is passed or not passed, etc. Therefore, the public is the party concerned. Inappropriate, the judgment dismissed.