sheet

Even holding a sports meeting to buy souvenirs is greedy

[Reporters Zhang Ruizhen, Chen Fengli/Comprehensive Report] Former Nantou County Mayor Li Chaoqing and his wife and brother-in-law Jian Ruiqi (both have been imprisoned) and others were accused of using typhoon repair or reconstruction projects to take back deductions during their tenure, regardless of the size of the project. He was involved in 111 corruption cases and received a kickback of 12.74 million yuan. Rebates for disaster repair projects that were critical to human life affected the quality of the project and made county residents scold. Repeatedly, Li She's 111 crimes and 94 crimes have not yet been determined. The Taichung High Branch judged in the second instance yesterday that in addition to four innocent cases, the other 90 cases were combined into 81 cases, and each was sentenced to five years and six years in prison. From June to June of six years, the total sentence was four hundred and fifty years and four months.

111 cases and 17 cases were previously sentenced to 16 and a half years

The Taichung High Court stated that after all the verdicts in this case are determined, the execution prosecutor will apply to the court to determine the combined sentence that should be executed.

Please read on...

Li Chaoqing was involved in a total of 111 crimes, 17 cases have been decided, the combined execution of 16 years in June, and the remaining 94 cases were returned by the Supreme Court.

The disaster-stricken area projects also claim rebates and take them in person

Many of the detained projects that Li Chaoqing took back were disaster repair projects. Restricted bidding was adopted and they were assigned to fixed persons. Among them, after the Morakot typhoon in 2009, during the project of repairing the Lianwai Road in Shenmu Village, Xinyi Township, Li Chaoqing, The total cost of the project was 94.6 million yuan, and a 10% rebate was claimed at 9.46 million yuan. At that time, Li also personally went to get the rebate. The contractor put the 9.46 million yuan in cash in a grape carton and put it in Li's seat. Take the car away.

In addition to the larger Shenmu Village Union Road Project, all large and small projects are greedy. Even small projects of 30,000 to 500,000 yuan will receive a 10% rebate, causing the county residents to shake their heads and curse.

The second-instance judgment also pointed out that Li Chaoqing was accused of using the "Fanabi C1-011 Shuili Xiangtou Line 58 2K+500 (Wenlu Bridge) Road Disaster Rehabilitation and Construction Project Supervisor contracted by the Nantou County Government when he was the head of Nantou County. He and his wife and brother-in-law Jian Ruiqi and others recovered deductions for embezzlement, and even the “101 National Games venue layout and prizes and souvenirs” were deducted. A total of 88 deductions were recovered, with an amount of 530,000 yuan. Yu Yuan (more on the scope of the second-instance trial).

In the second instance, Li Chaoqing completely denied the withdrawal of the deduction, arguing that he was framed, but the witnesses surnamed Huang and other witnesses (the co-defendant), and the manufacturer who handed the deduction to the testimonials, are enough to determine that Li Chaoqing and others have withdrawn the deduction for corruption. Eight years should be commuted in accordance with the "Criminal Prompt Trial Law".

Judge: why corrupt officials

The presiding judge of the collegial panel, Chen Hongqing, the accompanying judge, Lin Meiling, and the appointed judge, Yang Wenguang, criticized Li Chaoqing for abusing his power, and his wife and brother-in-law Jian Ruiqi took back the deductions for personal gain. , why not."

The collegial panel emphasized that whenever there is a storm in the mountainous area of ​​Nantou County, roads and bridges are broken, and people's lives and properties are seriously damaged. (some of the crimes were "imaginative co-operating and co-operating criminals", which were considered one offense, totaling 81 crimes), and had no remorse after committing the crime, and was sentenced to five years and six years for each charge of receiving kickbacks for co-operating office works in accordance with the Corruption Offences Ordinance From June to June of the sixth year, the case can be appealed.