The constitution is the supreme law of the country.

The trial of the Constitutional Court has used the method of inquiry under Section 27, meaning that the court has the power to collect evidence on its own.

and according to the provisions of section 26, it states that “In the performance of duties under this Organic Act, a judge shall be an official in the process of justice under the Penal Code.”

For the constitutional law that the drafting committee has prepared and promulgated as the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand in 2017, former senior police officer, legislator

also commented that

has prepared a document on the purpose and annotations for each section of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 (2017)

In the foreword it states

It is intended for the benefit of education and enforcement of the constitution, in order to create knowledge and understanding of the provisions of the constitution.

including to be used as a solution

If there is a reason for interpretation

Article 3, paragraph 2, clearly states that the National Assembly, the Council of Ministers, the Courts, independent organizations and government agencies

They must perform their duties in accordance with the Constitution, laws and the rule of law.

for the common good of the nation

and the well-being of the people as a whole

The decision of the Constitutional Court judges must adhere to all constitutional law principles related to the 8-year hot knot in the chair of Prime Minister Gen. Prayut Chan-ocha.

The procedure of the Constitutional Court Articles 73 to 75 clearly states that

There must be a justification for the decision on each issue and the provisions of the Constitution and the law referred to, including the “results of the ruling”.

All judiciaries must write their personal rulings in writing and publish them in the Government Gazette.

If the ruling is "fluttered", it will have an effect on the highest law of the country.