"Big Tu" explains 8 years on social media, like the opinion of "Meechai", the Constitutional Court beats the leaked information

Thai Rath Edition

  • news

  • politics

8 Sep. 2022 04:59 a.m.

share

Facebook

Twitter

Line

Copy link

record

Documents are out of office for 8 years, flowing non-stop.

The prime minister's statement appeared to accept the child "Mechai" "Prayut" countered that the petitioner misunderstood the law and the facts.

Confirmed that sitting as prime minister does not contravene international standards - the intention of the Constitution, claiming to be prime minister for the first time according to

The 57 interim constitution ended, the expiration of the 60 constitution, coming into force on April 6, 2017, cannot be included.

Based on the opinions of the special decree 7, the CDC determines 8 years, counting only the Prime Minister under the 60th Constitution, not related to any other issue

Opposition to ex-president

CDC is liable for perjury

Submit proof of refusal

Breaking up the minutes of the meeting, CDC No. 501, certifying content No. 500, stamping on the face of "Chon Nan", looking at the leaked documents to see social trends.

The CDC has no weight to seize the constitution - the book of intentions "Somkid" sits on the chairman of the ET Party "Sonthirat", oh, the election has turned over

The senator-senator smashes the switch, shuts off the switch, 4 bodies of senators settled down

After an explanation letter from Mr. Mechai Ruchuphan, chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC), counting the 8-year term as Prime Minister of Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense from April 6. 2017, the latest, there is also a document cited as a statement of

General Prayut

The corresponding fall followed.

While the minutes of the CDC meeting No. 501 were published, it also refutes Mr. Meechai's claims.

Another clarification book of "Big Tu" leaked.

On September 7, reporters reported that

In the online world and social media, documents have been published that claim to clarify the allegations.

General Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, sent to the Constitutional Court

In the case of a request for an 8-year term, a total of 23 pages clarified a total of 8 items, concluding that Article 1. Confirmed that the counting of the 8-year term of office of Prime Minister from 2014 is incorrect.

Since he was prime minister twice, first under the 2014 interim constitution, after the 2017 constitution came into force, he continued to hold the position of prime minister according to the interim constitutional provisions of the 2017 constitution until elections.

and was elected as Prime Minister for the 2nd time until now

The petitioner could not count the period of being prime minister for the first time.

because the 2014 interim constitution has expired

Since the date of the 2017 constitution coming into force and the promulgation of the 2017 constitution, the status of Prime Minister under the Royal Command on August 24, 2014 has ended since April 6, 2017 as well.

Prime Ministership cannot be counted.

“The termination resulted in his first prime ministership.

Excluding the date of the 2017 Constitution coming into force, the period of first Prime Minister and Prime Minister after the Constitution comes into force cannot be counted.

As for holding office from April 6, 2017, he will hold office under the provisions of the Constitution until a new cabinet is established.

After the election in 2019, so being Prime Minister after the constitution came into force.

Therefore, the position of the new Prime Minister according to the transitional chapter

and has been disconnected from being Prime Minister for the first time.”

Based on the 7th Constitution, 8 years, just the Prime Minister under the 60th Constitution

The document also states that Article 2, the 8-year term under Article 158, paragraph 4 of the Constitution, is a limitation of legal rights.

which the constitution does not expressly stipulate that

This includes being Prime Minister under other constitutions.

and, in principle, legally interpreted

If the constitution is not clearly stipulated

It cannot be construed in a way that restricts the rights of individuals.

In line with the guidelines of the Council of State, a special committee established on January 17, 2022 to consider the case for an 8-year term of office as Prime Minister.

Consisting of the Council of State

There are 7 members of the Constitution Drafting Committee, namely Mr. Mechai Ruchuphan, Mr. Norachit Singhaseni, Mr. Thitiphan Chueboonchai, Mr. Praphan Naikowit, Mr. Pakorn Nilpraphan, Mr. Atchaporn Jaruchinda and Mr. Udom Ratthaamrit, the seven Councilors. People see that the provisions set an 8-year term, referring to the Prime Minister under the Constitution of 2017 only.

Not contrary to international principles - the intention of the Constitution.

The document states that Article 3 of the Constitutional Court

There was a ruling on his status as a minister in 2019 and 2018, regarding his position as a minister before the 2017 constitution came into force as a minister.

From the date the 2017 Constitution was promulgated and must be under the 2017 Constitution, Article 4 affirms that holding the position of Prime Minister does not conflict with international standards and the spirit of the Constitution.

I believe in good faith on the basis of the law.

Rule of law and international standards that my current Prime Minister's office is not more than 8 years as stipulated by the Constitution.

Because the term of being Prime Minister for the first time under the 2014 Constitution, which has ended

to be counted with the Prime Minister after the 2017 Constitution came into force

Use the Constitutional Court to interpret it, not the facts.

Article 5 Minutes of the 500th constitutional drafting committee meeting in 2018, which stated the opinion of Mr. Mechai Ruchuphan, the chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee, that the period before the 2017 Constitution could be counted, found that the document was not a memorandum of the intentions of the Constitution Drafting Committee. constitution

It was just a conversation between Mr. Mechai and Mr. Supot.

Pearl only. Article 6, an excuse to state that I do not disclose assets and liabilities.

By using the rights under the NACC law that he has been the Prime Minister continuously

cannot be considered the same matter. Article 7 The Constitutional Court must interpret and use the Constitution to determine characteristics and prohibited characteristics under the law.

Not according to the facts generally perceived by the people.

to protect the public interest

Because listening to the facts that are generally known

It is the principle used to listen to the evidence of the court only.

It is not a legal principle used to interpret the law.

invalid argument

The verdict is not yet over.

The document states that Article 8 allegations that

I have held office for 8 years on August 24, 2022 due to a misunderstanding of the facts and the law of the petitioner.

And I reiterate that the term of office as prime minister cannot be counted from being prime minister in 2014 because my first prime minister has come to an end.

and has been interrupted since April 6, 2017, which is the date that the 2017 Constitution was promulgated including holding the position of Prime Minister under other constitutions

Therefore, the accusation of the petitioner is not in accordance with the law and intent of the Constitution and the rule of law.

Therefore, I ask the Constitutional Court to rule that my position as Prime Minister has not ended in accordance with the 2017 Constitution and according to the allegations of the petitioner to submit an answer to the allegations signed by Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister.

Breaking the record, CDC 501, punching "Mechai"

At the same time, the minutes of the 501st CDC meeting were published on Tuesday, September 11, 2018, which can be viewed on the website.

“Parliament.go.th” under the topic of “Meeting Schedule” was scheduled for meeting No. 501 at 1:30 p.m. on September 11, 2018. Indeed, the document scheduled for the meeting dated September 10, 2018, Mr. Natha Duang. Wichai, Assistant Secretary of the Constitution Drafting Committee

instead of the Secretary of the Constitution Drafting Committee

meeting

The CDC has studied the state drafting committee.

The Statute and Advisor to the CDC regarding the 500th CDC meeting, the meeting resolved to summon the 501st CDC meeting on Tuesday, September 11, 2018 with the following agenda:

Matters notified by the chairman to the meeting

Regarding the certification of meeting minutes, etc., it means that the meeting has already certified the minutes of the 500th meeting and does not match with Mr. Mechai's statement to the Constitutional Court.

indicating that the 500th meeting was the last meeting

Constitutional Court says September 8 is not yet the date to vote.

At 2:30 p.m. at the Office of the Constitutional Court, Mr. Chaowana Traimas, Secretary-General of the Constitutional Court

A press conference of the Constitutional Court judges "special agenda" on Sept. 8 said that the court's meeting on Sept. 8 does not mean that the court has rushed the time or slowed it down or made it short of the process. Sep. Haven't reached the stage yet to know what the resolution will be.

It's just bringing information and evidence from all parties.

Is this enough to lead to further diagnosis?

There is no news that there will be an appointment to hear the verdict in the next 15 days. There will be a discussion about whether it is in the level of adjudication or not. If it is not enough, the court proceedings need to seek additional evidence.

According to the law, in some cases, such as budget cases

Specifically, the decision will be made within 15 days and 30 days, but the lawsuit does not specify.

It depends on the meeting to consider.

The case has not yet been investigated.

shall be in the adjudication period for not less than 7 days after the court deems that there is sufficient evidence to make a decision.

Constitutional Court presiding over leaked documents

Mr. Chaowana said that

Ask for cooperation from the media.

In the case of news that there is a book that Mr. Mechai Ruchuphan, former chairman of the CDC

leaked or leaked to social media

The President of the Constitutional Court was very worried.

not calm

check for facts

regret that it fell out of impact on the commentators

There is also an allusion to the parties in the case.

As for whether it is true or not, however, is a later matter.

But at the beginning of the investigation because it was related to the documents in the case

The court must also examine

means checking in the administrative layer

It's not a judicial matter.

When asked whether to blame the person for releasing the document or not

Mr. Chaowana said it depends on the conditions of the matter.

The President of the Constitutional Court deems it necessary to conduct a preliminary examination.

To ensure confidence in the review process

because the case is not yet finished

The court attaches importance to increasing measures to be more strict

When asked to reiterate whether the leaked Mr. Meechai documents are real or not

Mr. Chaowan replied that

can't confirm

because they see the same way as the media

seen on social media

When asked if there was an opinion document of Gen.

Prayut fell out again.

Mr. Chaowana said

The court has not yet seen such documents.

But I have tried my best to keep the control as tight as possible.

The Constitutional Court judge is concerned about the impact on outsiders.

But he himself was not susceptible to criticism.

and have the strength to do the best job

"Vishnu" did not know, did not see the clarification.

At 10:00 a.m. at the Government House, Deputy Prime Minister Witsanu Krue-ngam gave an interview on the case of disseminating an explanation to the Constitutional Court claiming the name of Mr. Mechai Richuphan, former chairman of the CDC, to count the age of the Prime Minister of Thailand.

Gen. Prayut in 2017 and stated that the minutes of the 500th CDC meeting did not have a confirmation that the meeting had not been found, had not spoken to Mr. Meechai for more than 10 days and had not spoken with

General Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, because the person who meets Gen. Prayut often is Maj. Gen.

Wira Rojanawas Legal Team The said document he saw via Line, who sent it, did not know.

parts are reliable

or don't know

As far as it sounds, it doesn't come out of Mr. Meechai.

It's like you sent it to the Constitutional Court and then came out of the court, I don't know.

heard that

but have read that document

and don't know if his documents came out or not

Whether it's pressure or not, I don't know.

Because it's really not a secret.

submitted to the court

In the hands of more than 9 people, what other officers?

but should not be disclosed

pointing to the meeting minutes

CDC weightlessness

When asked that, recently, another document came out, namely, the minutes of the 501st CDC meeting, which came out to certify the results of the 500th meeting to refute Mr Mechai's explanation. Have you seen it yet?

Mr. Wissanu said

Don't know about it

When asked if the 501st meeting is important, the court must consider it or not.

Mr. Wissanu said

All must be taken into account.

The court had never seen

But when there is an issue may be picked up for consideration.

When asked to repeat the minutes of the 501st meeting with Mr. Mechai's explanation

What weighs more?

Mr Wissanu said that both the 500 and the 501 had no weight, having said that the memorandum was the minutes of a meeting that took place a year after the constitution was promulgated to make a letter of intent and annotation for each section of the constitution. one

The second weak point is the 3 people talking to each other, namely Mr. Mechai, Mr. Supot Kaikhai, vice president of the CDC.

Mr. Supachai Yavaprapha, CDC, while CDC

The rest didn't say anything.

and did not vote

Mr. Meechai came out to clarify whether it was true or not, he did not know.

Moreover, saying that the scribe is not able to write correctly is another weakness.

Most importantly, this meeting was to do a book.

In the book that mentions Article 158, it does not mention when the counting of the Prime Minister's office starts, so the book must be based on the interpretation.

must adhere to the content of the book, the purpose

“You sit in a meeting to make a book.

Whatever you say

But what about the book that came out?

Because that book is intended to be used as a guide for interpreting the Constitution.

If you put your mind to that when speaking, why not write it down in a book?

It appears that there is no

But the book said that setting an 8-year term to not monopolize power is a very valid principle.

But how to count like the 500th meeting? It doesn't exist, and this matter is not thought to be done right now to distort it.

It's been happening since 2018," Mr Wissanu said.

When asked to emphasize that the most important weight is the book.

The purpose and annotation of each section of the constitution 60 Mr. Wissanu said that is correct. How will the weight of the book rest on the person speaking during the writing process?

But if the weight is on the speaker when speaking while drafting the constitution

is the intent of the draft

When, in his opinion, the court had to give more weight to the constitution and the letter of intent than the explanation of Mr. Meechai.

and what else

Soon the media will know.

We go to the meeting about the 500th and 501st meeting. In the end, it's up to the court to take matters into consideration.

But with the documents coming out now

considered normal

We have love and hate.

Which side benefits, which side loses benefits, it's good to let people know that they don't know.

But in the end, it's best to wait to hear the court's ruling.

Repeat the clarification "Big Tu" does not start counting the year 2014

When asked to read the statement of the legal team.

General Prayut

Since when did he count the days starting as prime minister?

Mr Wissanu said that he had already said that it was not on August 24, 2014, which date would be up to the court.

Couldn't tell the reason for starting the counting day.

But not from the year 2014

Because by the time March 23, 2023, they are all gone. If Gen. Prayut will go further, he must enter the system for political parties to nominate according to the process.

Whether you will lay your hands or not is not known, we have never spoken.

Whether it's over or not, I don't know, but it's over. When asked if it's extended to 2017 or 2019, Gen. Prayut can come back as prime minister next time or not.

Mr. Wissanu replied that

that's about

General Prayut

But in principle, the court did not care that

Gen. Prayut will join which party will nominate or not.

General Prayut will be again or not?

But the important thing is that the court will tell you how long it will last.

Well, just read the court's ruling and you'll know.

The court took everything and hit it.

The opposition submitted evidence of the argument.

At 2:45 p.m. at the National Assembly, the opposition party, led by Dr. Cholanan Srikaew, Pheu Thai Party leader

as the leader of the opposition

Submitted a letter to the President of the Council through Dr. Sukit Atthopakorn, an advisor to the President of the Council, to submit additional evidence to the Constitutional Court for decision making.

Due to the leaked documents published in various media, the contents refer to Mr. Mechai Ruchuphan, former chairman of the CDC, made a letter to the Constitutional Court.

Summary of General Prayut's term of office as Prime Minister to start from April 6, 2017

The opposition saw that Mr Mechai's statement was considered a false statement to the court and therefore objected by collecting documents against Mr. Mechai to confirm his term as Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Thailand.

Gen. Prayut had to count the date on August 24, 2014 because of His Majesty's Royal Command.

Appointed as Prime Minister in 2014 and has served continuously.

The opposition also attached the minutes of the CDC meeting.

No. 500 contains 22 pages of details to refer to the document No. 500 in its entirety, along with the minutes of the 501st CDC meeting dated 11 September 2008, the last meeting.

There is content to certify that the 497-500th CDC meeting is correct, without any corrections.

So the 500th meeting minutes are complete.

believe in releasing documents to propagate social trends

Dr Chonnan said

The opposition coalition has asked the Speaker of the House to submit documents to the Constitutional Court as soon as possible because on September 8, the Constitutional Court will hold a special meeting.

I hope that the latest documents submitted by the opposition will reach the Constitutional Court for consideration by Sept. 8. At what stage does Mr. Meechai's document have to be leaked?

But what is predictable is like testing social trends.

To criticize what do you think about this issue?

Because the Constitutional Court's ruling guide will give weight to 2 aspects, namely the law and political science facts about what happened, how it will benefit or punish the society.

If the ruling of the Constitutional Court is in accordance with Mr. Mechai's opinion

will reinforce the conflicts that will arise in the future from the prime minister's desire to stay

But it will create conflicts until the crisis is still unknown. When asked what Mr. Mechai stated in the minutes of the 500th CDC meeting in 2018, with the opinion that Mr. Mechai explained to the Constitutional Court last time

What is more reliable than Dr.

Chonnan replied that the year 2018 was more convincing.

At that time, Mr. Mechai was completely conscious, but his latest clarification, Mr. Mechai even forgot that there was a record of the 501st meeting showing his lack of consciousness.

Punjab shameful throwing sins.

Mr. Anusorn Iamsaard, Deputy Secretary of the Party Strategy and Political Direction Committee

Said that the record of the 500th CDC meeting, the officials recorded incomplete.

and no certification of the minutes of the meeting

unlikely

Officials were selected to take minutes of the meeting.

It's the ultimate level. If it's wrong 4-5 years ago, why didn't Mr. Mechai and the other attendees protest?

It is shameful to cast the blame on the authorities if it is not true.

Considered as a receipt and knockout punch.

Mr. Meechai knows in his heart why he said two times, and did not agree with each other. What was the intention and foreseeable result?

Gen. Prayut was caught in a trap of his own written constitution.

political responsibility

Beyond legal responsibility if Gen. Prayut

Surviving may be like winning a battle, but losing a war when the people do not accept it.

"Tay" threatens to notify the Crime Suppression Division for perjury

Mr. Mongkolkit

Suksintharanon

List of MPs

The leader of the Thai Sriwilai party said that Mr. Meechai had to explain whether it was his own document or not.

He obtained the minutes of the CDC meeting No. 501 on September 11, 2018, and certified the minutes of the meeting from No. 497-500 on September 7, 2018, where the document was leaked on the Internet.

If Mr. Mechai said the truth and recorded this document to the Constitutional Court on September 7, 2018, he said one way, and the day he wrote to the court, he said another way.

If the leaked document is true

will request the Crime Suppression Division to prosecute Mr. Mechai

According to Section 177 of the Criminal Code, make a false statement immediately.

Don't let your children remember the bad. The 84-year-old, don't let your children curse after death, and any leader who has a lawyer.

and then make untrue comments, cover up half of the facts and facts.

He gave it to beheaded.

Being with someone will cause disaster to that person,” said Mr. Mongkolkit.

"Big Pom" did not respond to clarifications.

at 2:00 p.m. at the multipurpose building

National Defense Academy, General Prawit Wongsuwan, Deputy Prime Minister, acting for the Prime Minister.

Presided over the announcement of the results of the study to support the 20-year National Strategic Propulsion of National Defense College students, Class 64, College of Staff, Class 63, Royal Thai Army College, Class 67, Naval Academy, Class 54, and Air Force College, Class No. 56, with Gen. Anupong Phaochinda joining in when asked by reporters about the publication of the statement of

General Prayut Chan-o-cha, General Prawit did not answer.

immediately walk up to the car

While Mr. Anucha Burapachaisri, Deputy Secretary-General of the Prime Minister for Political Affairs, is acting as a spokesman for the Prime Minister's Office.

Please wait a little longer

The Constitutional Court will clarify soon.

"Sereepisuth" countered the friend's watch. It's not over yet.

At the National Assembly, Pol. Gen. Sereepisut Temeiwes, a member of the list of MPs.

As chairman of the Commission on Anti-Corruption and Misconduct (NACC), the House of Representatives spoke about the investigation of the friend's borrowed watch of Gen. Prawit Wongsuwan, Deputy Prime Minister that it is still under investigation. The facts of the persons involved except

MR Pridiyathorn Devakun, the estate manager of Mr. Pattawat Suksriwong, a friend who lent the watch.

will be invited to clarify in a timely manner

After collecting and analyzing evidence is finished.

Confirm that this story is not over.

believe that it is not a watch borrowed by a friend as

Gen Prawit asserted that

NACC considers

Gen. Prawit was the one who appoints the NACC president himself. The story came out like this.

MCOT invites Somkid to sit as party chairman

At 10:00 a.m. at the Grand Ballroom, Rama Gardens Hotel, the Future Thai Party

had a special meeting of the executive committee

Led by Mr. Uttama Savanayana, party leader and Mr. Sontirat Sontijirawong, party secretary.

Then a seminar for those who expressed their intention to stand for election

Party MPs across the country

Mr. Uttama said at one point that

The executive committee of the party had a resolution to invite Mr. Somkid.

Jatusripitak

Former Deputy Prime Minister sits as chairman of the Thai Future Party and on September 8, Mr. Somkid will come to announce the official launch and meet party members.

Become the leader of the party to drive the party's strategy towards its goals.

The big problem requires hard and intense political work.

more serious

After setting up, you must move forward with strength

For the important goal is victory, the last curve 6 months before the election must go full

"Sonthirat" to keep an eye on the SEC has flipped the lock

As Mr Sontirat said

The party has a good day and night.

As politics reach a point of hopelessness

The old party has an image that creates uncertainty among lonely people.

The party therefore tries to turn the people's hopes into reality.

Advancing strategies and policies

"Thai Future Fund" with an amount of more than 300 billion baht, supporting the allocation of funds to distribute to various areas thoroughly

The government is likely to dissolve the upper house of parliament.

And this election will turn around enormously.

Please keep an eye on it.

There is a chance for a bright new party with no scars, no grudges, and hopes to solve problems for the people.

A giant fall can always happen.

Politics on the boundaries of change

Election results may not meet everyone's expectations.

First to lead the army to "Phuket" 15 Sept.

Later, at 11:00 a.m., Mr. Uttama, Mr. Sontirat, along with the party leaders joined the press conference that

The special meeting of the Executive Committee of the Party had a resolution to invite Mr. Somkid to join the party.

Propose to accept the chairmanship of the party, PT. On September 7, he will invite himself.

Ask to follow Mr. Somkid's openness on the stage on September 8. As for being a candidate for the Prime Minister, the party still has time.

In addition to the launch of Mr. Somkid

There may be some surprises to launch on September 8, while Mr Sontirat said that after Mr Somkid took the position of party chairman.

will leave the line to work for the party immediately

The first meeting was to meet the Andaman business sector in Phuket province on September 15, reporters reported.

At the end, Mr. Somkid's party membership application form, which had been submitted since September 2, was opened for the media to see.

TAT sends "Baonik" to win the Sakon Nakhon MPs

that the Thai Party creates Thai

Khunying Sudarat Keyuraphan, chairman of the Thai Sang Thai Party (TAT), along with the party's executives, introduced Mr. Sirapop Sompol as candidate for the Sakon Nakhon District 1 MP. Khunying Sudarat said that

The party is pleased to have a new pedigree politician.

is the executive heir

Sakon Nakhon Provincial Administrative Organization came to strengthen the army to fight the election battle of Sakon Nakhon Province. Mr. Sirapop is a new generation with knowledge and ability with DNA. TAT aims to create an economy for people's brothers and sisters.

From now on, the new candidates will be gradually launched.

Meets the DNA of district parties across the country.

prepare for election

Mr. Sirapop or Baonik is a member of Sakon Nakhon Provincial Administrative Organization, used to be an independent actor with many followers.

Has worked in dramas, series, commercials, music videos.

Discuss the constitution. The senators dream of turning off the switch. The senators.

At 9:00 a.m. at the National Assembly, there was a National Assembly meeting with Mr. Chuan Leekpai, the President of the National Assembly, acting as the chairman of the meeting.

Considering 4 additional constitutional amendments for the second consecutive day, most MPs debate support for all 4 amendments, especially Section 272, cutting the power of senators to vote to elect the prime minister before the House of Representatives expires. Still, there are both supporters and oppositions.

But the atmosphere at the meeting of senators and opposition senators clashed with each other at some point.

Many senators debated dissatisfaction with

MPs debate satirical

Impaired in acting with harsh words, for example, Mr. Kittisak Ratanawaraha, senator, alluded to the government's rice-pledging scheme.

Miss Yingluck Shinawatra made Mr. Pichet

Chua Muang Phan, a Chiang Rai MP, the PAD party protested loudly to withdraw their speech.

While Mr. Thawin Pliansri, senator, debated that during his life he saw a dictator hiding wearing a democratic robe.

But the behavior is more authoritative.

everyone has seen it

Dictatorship from brother to sister, brother to brother-in-law, may be from father to son.

"Amarat" hits "Seree" bad example

In the afternoon, during which Mr. Seree Suwanphanon, senator, debates alluding to the party

The SEC often accuses

The senators are not elected.

causing Mrs. Amarat Chokpamitkul, Mr. Nattawut Buapratum, the list of MPs, the National Election Commission of Thailand protested Mr. Pornpetch Wichitcholchai, the chairman of the meeting, trying to mediate to speak on the issue.

But Mr. Seree continued to refer to

causing another round of protest

Mrs. Amarat responded that

There is no maturity that people despise.

The president didn't say anything and still spoke.

a bad example

Mr. Seree asked to withdraw his speech.

But Mrs. Amarat

walked out of the meeting room

Mr. Pornpetch cut the chapter for further discussion.

By Mr. Seree concluded that

I disagree with the 4 drafts.

senator Somchai Sawangkarn argued that all four constitutional amendments should not be passed, especially Article 272 amendment, must respect the 15 million people's referendum to approve the power.

Senator elects prime minister

If you do not agree with this constitution

because it is a tyranny

Don't want to work with the senators, don't agree with these rules

don't vote

Not hating eels, eating


curry sauce, coming into the House of Representatives with this constitution.

Pheu Thai believes that all 4 figures have been hit.

Until 17.00 hrs. Mr. Pornpetch, the chairman of the meeting

Let the owner of each draft edit.

Summary of the discussion by Mr. Sutin Klangsaeng, a member of the Maha Sarakham MPs, debated that as far as the discussion was heard, they were confident that all 4 drafts would fall. Most of the senators announced they would not accept all 4 figures, but the reason was also saying they did not accept them. Disappointed, angry, disappointing for the people.

The more refusing to accept these rules and saying that they must not come again in the next period

But we will frequent in revising the rules.

"Somchai" leaves the buoy to fear the accident. The senator eats bananas.

While Mr. Somchai Srisuthiyakorn, as a proposed amendment to Section 272, said that powers need to be changed.

Senator elects prime minister

The continuation of the national strategy and national reform plan has ended.

and public feelings

didn't feel

Senator elects prime minister with impartiality

but focus on politics

In the future in 2023, if the senator chooses the prime minister, even from the political party leader who is purely politician

But the allegations could be exacerbated.

People may understand that the bananas that used to be distributed

MPs may be bananas that come to give away.

The senators can choose who to be prime minister. It's time for the senators to let go and vote to approve the amendment of Section 272


after the owners of all four drafts have been fully debated.

for members of the National Assembly to vote on the agenda

using the method of calling the names of all 4 figures

Parliament voted to overturn four in a row

Until 21.00 after all the members of Parliament have called and voted.

It appears that none of the four additional constitutional amendments drafts received more than half or 364 of the 727 members of the parliament who were able to perform duties, and less than a third or 84 of the senators approved it. Voting results: MPs from the Democratic Party, the Ruam Phalang Party and the smaller party MPs voted against accepting all four principles, while other coalition parties

like the Pride Thai Party

Democrats and all opposition parties voted to accept all four principles, while most senators, especially senators who are police.

The military voted against accepting all four principles, with only some senators who voted against the 4th draft principle on cutting power.

Senators voted to elect the prime minister, such as Mrs Kanchanarat Leewirot, Khamnoon Sittisman, Mr Panthep Klanarongran, Ms. Khunying Pornthip Rojanasunan, Nawarat Pongpaiboon, Pisan Manawapat, and Wanchai.


Sonsiri, Mr. Montien Boontan, Gen. Lertrat Rattanavanich, Mr. Wanlop Tangkananurak

Read more...