Warning to play political games in the council: the people will be punished

Thai Rath Edition

8 Aug 2022 6:44 a.m.

share

Facebook

Twitter

Line

Copy link

record

A war where all sides want to win.

It is a figurative phrase to see a game trick in a parliament trying to kick a draft.

The Organic Act (Constitution) on elections

Members of the House of Representatives who are considered in the 2-3 agenda countdown to the 180-day deadline on August 15

By Mr.

Somchai Srisuthiyakon, committee to

consider the draft election law

MP and chairman of the strategy to drive the policy of the Seri Ruam Thai Party

He was one of the first to point out to society to look at the game of fighting in parliament.

From this line is a view of the path leading to the end of the war.

Between "fighting with reason" will take a long time.

Certainly not hopeful

with "fighting with a game of trickery" exchanged with the cheers of the people

If the fight is as straightforward as possible

When the majority in parliament leans towards the 500 formula to calculate the list of MPs, it has to vote through 2-3 terms.

If you turn over here again

Society sees you as unprincipled.

Therefore, the Parliament must let it go and follow the steps.

after this process

The Election Commission is a related organization.

Comments must be made within 10 days.

if sent back that there

"Any point that contradicts" or "contradicts with the Constitution" or "is unable to comply", the National Assembly must consider within 30 days how to follow the Election Commission or not.

But within 10 days, the Election Commission did not send anything.

would mean

The Election Commission does not contradict

The prime minister had to hold the matter for 5 days to be presented to the King.

In the next five days, one-tenth of the number of members of the House of Representatives in the House of Representatives can pass the matter through the House of Representatives to the court.

The constitution ruled that

Are there any conflicting or inconsistent statements with the Constitution?

Constitutional Court, accept or not?

How do you get it and point it out?

"Not contradicting - contrary in essence" If not contradicting, then move on.

Prime Minister brought to the King

announced in the Government Gazette

The next election will use the 500 formula to go under this rule.

“But if contrary to the essence

As a result, the entire law was dropped.

The government must think of a solution. There are two options. If there is an election

But the child law was not issued in time.

The government also exercised the power of resolutions.

The Cabinet has issued a royal decree (Royal Decree), which looks like it depends on the government.

or the government considers

The Royal Decree also raised controversy that

polished or not polished

The Constitution, which follows the formula 100, formula 500, contradicts the Constitution.

The government might think in the same way that the rest of the time goes back to using Constitution 60, a single ballot.

Vote counting on a allocation basis, 350 members of the district MPs to 150 list-list MPs.”

Returning to the Constitution. 60, the child law does not have to be amended.

So these things will happen after the court.

The Constitution has ruled that

The “essence of exfoliation” process can take 3-4 months.

The longer it takes, the closer it gets to Election Day.

The government was more justified.

Return to the original rules

because doing something else is too late

In this case, even

I still think it's beautiful.

At least several organizations are involved.

and walk the steps

“Turn it upside down” is an unattractive scene.

which can do both

1. Did not pass Agenda 3, overturn it at all by allowing it to be considered in time and then voted over the final decision.

It leads to amending the Constitution or issuing a decree. The government may choose to amend the Constitution because there is still enough time.

But in this form, people will ask questions.

to the members of Parliament that

“Do you think so?” or just “waiting for orders” or looking only at “the benefit of someone, some group”?

It creates a bad picture for the parliament.

But what's worse is faking it!

Used the parliamentary meeting for a long time until after August 15, 180 days of the deadline, the law was not completed and returned to the original draft.

which is the body of

Cabinet returns everything back to formula 100.

Now, a group of people actually thinks, actually works, and actually happens like 3 Aug. ago.

The National Assembly considers the draft Act stipulating the duration of work in the 13 sections of the judicial process.

Consider 8 hours and it's done.

It appears that each section discusses for only 5-10 minutes, but presses the buzzer to signal the members of Parliament to vote on a per-section basis, term 2, taking hours.

This is a deliberate behavior that causes the council to collapse.

in order for the law of the election of the members of the House of Representatives to fall

Both approaches lead to court.

Constitution and then go back to start all over.

Mr. Somchai said that it came from amending the Constitution, not draining water.

If you want to revert to using two cards as a parallel system or allocating allocations, you need to amend 6 sections of the Constitution, but the Parliament only changes 3 sections.

So, is it wrong with the Constitution or not? The Formula 500 or Formula 100 party that loses is sent to the Constitutional Court to decide whether there is a clear resolution, but as of today, it's not that one party is wrong or one party isn't wrong.

But both are wrong and neither are wrong.

It shows that since the beginning of the amendment of the Constitution, 60, finally returned to the original point.

Mr. Somchai said

People who are key players of political parties do not design the best system of the country.

But what system do you think made yourself win the election?

The vision is just that.

did not look beyond the country to benefit more

Let's try the Excel program today.

how is the score

Another day, say hey!!

Wrong here?

and then enter again like this

It changed back and forth.

So I said, "Two uncles...weak in mathematics" because I can't think for myself.

let someone else think

“If you want formula 100, you should fight for a reason.

Play in a procedural process

It's not a technique that breaks the meeting.

without attending the meeting

The debate drew on time until the important law was dropped.

If this is true, the enormous damage is done to Parliament.

You may win, get Formula 100 back with what you lost.

It's incomparably great.

People will remember which party did this.

Whether it's the opposition or the government that plays in an unusual way.

The council as a whole would lose its honour.

It is the first time for the Thai parliament after the birth of the 60th constitution that the reform law came in. The parliament has not completed its work within 180 days.”

At the same time, there was still damage.

good principles that make elections more transparent

Including meeting allowance, food committee, documents totaling about 2 million baht, not counting the opportunity cost of people who come to work

most important is

The dignity of the parliament that makes the people feel that the parliament works for cause and effect.

not working under anyone's command

So you have to prove the value of Parliament today if the resonance from the people is loud enough for those who think of this approach to change their minds.

But I believe that will happen on the day of the Parliament.

That means you accept the harsh public criticism.

No matter which party says it has good popularity among the people.

How big is the party's vote base?

Choose this method... I believe that people will punish them for sure.

political team

Read more...