The Basic Court in Prizren has imposed a detention measure of one month on the defendants with the initials ES and TJ, as they are suspected of the criminal offense of rape.

According to the notification, the Court, in imposing the detention measure on the defendants, has assessed that there are legal reasons for imposing the detention measure.

"From the evidence gathered up to this stage, there is a well-founded suspicion that in the period of 16 and 17 June. "the way they escort him to a house forces him to consume alcoholic beverages and narcotics. in the court press release.

However, whether these facts will be argued will be assessed in the further stages of the criminal proceedings.

"When ordering detention, the Court has taken into account the gravity of the criminal offense, and the fact that the investigation procedure is in the initial stage, and in the future eventual witnesses should be questioned, medical examinations should be conducted and other evidence should be collected. to clarify the truth, therefore, the court finds that the detention on this point is reasonable, since with the defendants remaining at large, they may influence the injured party - and the aforementioned witnesses, in order to be replaced. their statements, so this would hinder the normal conduct of the investigation. "

"In the case of detention on remand, the judge has taken into account the personal characteristics of the defendants, and their verification results in repeat offenders of many criminal offenses, and this shows the risk that by releasing the same they can escape on purpose. evasion of criminal responsibility, and the same may repeat similar or even more serious criminal offenses against the injured party or other persons, in order to damage the investigative procedure ”.

"From the above circumstances, the trial judge has concluded that detention on remand at this stage is necessary and reasonable, in order to effectively conduct the investigative procedure, ensure the presence of defendants in the proceedings until the clarification of the circumstances for which there is a grounded suspicion that the defendants have committed the criminal offense which he is charged with ", it is further stated in the notification.

Against this decision, the dissatisfied party has the right to appeal to the Court of Appeals, while it is stated that the appeal against this decision did not postpone its execution.

/

Telegraphy

/