A unit in the capital of Sunrise Cannes in Tseung Kwan O suspected that the demolition of part of the main wall during the renovation period attracted the attention of all walks of life, including other residents, whether it would affect the structural safety of the building. Some owners' representatives collected signatures at the lobby tonight (31st) and jointly put forward the "Five Major Requirements", including urging the Buildings Department and the MTR Property Department to investigate whether the Guest Services Office was negligent in the incident and explain future improvement plans. During the period, a security guard called the police, saying that the relevant activities were not applied for, and the police officers came to the scene to investigate.

The "Capital Real Owners Team" launched a joint operation in the capital in the evening, with members including Cheung Chi-tung, Chairman of the 1st EA and others present to collect signatures from residents, and jointly put forward "five major requirements", including urging the Buildings Department and the MTR Property Department to investigate whether the Guest Services Office was negligent in the incident and explain future improvement plans, and requesting the MTR Customer Service to submit a detailed report to the owners and report regularly on the investigation and progress of the incident between the Government and MTR. Subsequently, a number of notice boards were placed at the site, indicating that the relevant activities were not authorized by the Guest Services Department.

Constable officers were called to the scene for investigation. (Online image)

The Police said that at around 7 p.m. tonight, a security guard at 1 Kangcheng Road received a report that 4 to 5 residents were engaged in signature collection activities at the lobby to pursue the incident of demolishing the main wall, but the activities were not applied for and the relevant persons refused to leave, and the incident was listed as a "complaint nuisance".

Buildings Department officers were present to find out. (Photo by Huang Xuerun)

The Buildings Department has indicated that officers of the Buildings Department inspected the unit afterwards with the owner of the unit concerned, the interior designer in charge of the decoration of the unit and the staff of the property management company and found that there were indeed irregularities in the unit, including the removal of a 720 mm thick structural wall about 2 mm wide and 150,200 mm high between the living room and the bedroom to install a new door. After inspecting the upper and lower floors of the units concerned, the officers of the Buildings Department concluded that the overall building structure was not dangerous.

The Buildings Department has learned that the owner concerned has taken the initiative to arrange for the contractor to install temporary support under the beams of the new door, and the Department will continue to follow up seriously to ensure that the statutory orders are properly complied with, and has launched a comprehensive investigation into whether the unit has breached the Buildings Ordinance, and will take punitive action (including criminal prosecution) against the person concerned depending on the outcome of the investigation.

The designer of the unit involved was interviewed to tell the design concept in the film after the completion of the renovation. (Screenshot of online clip)

According to the Buildings Ordinance, any construction works (including additions and alterations) involving private buildings, unless the requirements of section 41(3) of the Buildings Ordinance are exempt from approval or minor works can be carried out through the simplified requirements of the Minor Works Regulatory Regime, the person concerned should appoint an authorized person in accordance with section 14 of the Buildings Ordinance to submit plans to the Buildings Department and the plans can be carried out only after the plans have been approved and consent has been obtained to commence the works; The work involving the demolition of part of the structural wall is not exempt from approval and is not a minor work. Such works involving structural walls that are not approved by the Buildings Department will be regarded as illegal construction works.

A spokesman for the Buildings Department emphasised that it is the responsibility of owners to ensure that their buildings are free of illegal structures and that illegal construction works are not carried out. If you wish to carry out building additions or alterations, you should first seek advice from a building professional, including the feasibility of the works, and apply to the Buildings Department for approval of the building plans and consent as necessary before commencing the works, so as to ensure safety and not contravene the Buildings Ordinance. Construction professionals and contractors are also required to review the plans and other relevant documents in detail, as well as review the relevant requirements of the Buildings Ordinance and whether approval is required from the Buildings Department before proceeding with the relevant works to ensure the safety of occupants and building structures.

Carrying out construction work without permission is a serious offence under the Buildings Ordinance with a maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment and a fine of $40,100. Commits an offence if the works are carried out in such a way as to cause or substantial danger of injury to any person or damage to any property, and on conviction is punishable by imprisonment for three years and a fine of $<> million.

Any person who fails to comply with a statutory order issued by the Department without reasonable excuse is liable on conviction to a fine of $20,2 and imprisonment for one year, and to a fine of $<>,<> for each day the offence continues.

Some workers moved the fixed bracket to the unit involved. (Provided by Zhang Zhidong, former Chairman of Sunrise Kangcheng Capital Industry Committee)

The MTR Corporation replied to the "Hong Kong 29" enquiry the day before yesterday (01th) that the staff of the Sunrise Cannes Capital Guest Service and the staff of the Buildings Department had visited the unit concerned today to conduct a structural safety inspection and found that the unit was involved in irregularities, and the Buildings Department would follow up in accordance with the Buildings Ordinance, and the owners of the units concerned would arrange to complete the temporary reinforcement works within the day to ensure the structural safety of the building. The Guest Services Department will also cooperate with the relevant owners to carry out the restoration work with a view to completing the relevant works as soon as possible.

The reporter of "Hong Kong 01" interviewed the owner of the same room on the upper floor of the suspected unit involved on the same day, and he described that the decoration project of the unit involved was carried out for half a year, and it was not completed until May, during which the wall explosion and drilling wall were endless, but he did not feel anything unusual at that time, and it was not until the recent media report that he knew that gallium was suspected of penetrating the main wall. He was shocked and disappointed by the incident, criticizing that "the biggest responsibility lies with the owner, and every designer has any problems, but the reason is that he is not familiar with it, the structural wall system is known and depressed, and you have to apply for changes on a first-come-first-served basis", and was worried about the structural safety of the building, and it is estimated that the property price will be affected in the short term, causing losses to the owners of the "capital".

Online discussion board went viral last Saturday (27th), a video of a unit in the capital of the first phase of Sunrise Cannes in Tseung Kwan O, a subsidiary of the MTR Corporation, netizens suspected that the decoration company broke through a main wall and rebuilt it into a master room door. Some netizens are more than the unit decoration completion video and floor plan, the unit usable area of 681 feet, originally a three-room design, the designer opened the three-bedroom corridor together, into a large master suite and cloakroom, and in order to achieve the three-side bed and the bedside table on both sides, to achieve the hotel-style suite feeling that the householder wants, the master door needs to change the position, so the designer penetrates a wall between the living room and the bedroom and changes it to a door. However, netizens suspected that the wall was the main wall, fearing that it would endanger the structural safety of the building, and believed that the Buildings Department should investigate.

The unit was originally designed as a three-bedroom, and the designer opened the three-bedroom corridor and changed it into a large master suite and cloakroom, and the master door was also relocated, so the designer pierced a wall between the living room and the bedroom and changed it to a door. (Online video screenshot)

The Sunrise Cannes Capital Guest Office posted a notice last Saturday (27th) reminding residents that if they need to change the indoor wall, they need to apply to the Guest Service Office first, and they should not arbitrarily remove or change the main wall, so as not to affect the structure of the building. (Photo by Huang Xuerun)

After the incident of suspected that the main wall of the Sunrise Cannes unit was exposed, some netizens found that the video of the completion of the decoration had been removed, and the social media page of the decoration company had also been closed.

Some architects pointed out that if the consequences of wrongly demolishing the main wall are quite serious, including affecting the structure of other units upstairs and the safety of others, the relevant decoration and design company should be held responsible, and the units involved should be entrusted to professionals to understand how to repair it, including reconnecting steel bars.

Sunrise Kangcheng unit suspected of penetrating the main wall Buildings Department sent staff to investigate Workers moved fixed brackets into the house, Sunrise Kangcheng unit suspected of penetrating the main wall Upstairs floor owner reprimanded: The owner and designer have problems with the Sunrise Kangcheng unit suspected of demolishing the main wall Temporary reinforcement phase exposed Fang Guoshan: Owner attitude cooperation Sunrise Kangcheng Capital Unit suspected of penetrating the main wall MTR: No application for structural renovation received Sunrise Kangcheng Capital Unit suspected of penetrating the main wall List of decoration costs Demolition and scaffolding charge $X million Sunrise Kangcheng Capital suspected of demolishing the main wall Scholars point to total demolition or collapse: it seems that Zhang Feng has no feet and the sunrise Kangcheng capital is suspected of penetrating the main wall Architect: The consequences of demolishing the wrong wall are serious or it is necessary to refute the steel reinforcement sunrise Kangcheng capital unit suspected of penetrating the main wall Buildings Department: True will enforce the law Can be sentenced to prison fines Sunrise Kangcheng capital suspected of penetrating the main wall Unit introduction clip talks about another structural wall: demolition to sunrise Kangcheng unit suspected of demolishing the main wall MTR: The unit has violations Temporary reinforcement completed within a day to remove the main wall of Sunrise Cannes Buildings Department: The 200 mm thick structural wall was demolished The owner has been ordered to repair the main wall of Sunrise Cannes and demolish the main wall Buildings Department: Subject to investigation or criminal prosecution Lawyers are responsible for whom