Click to Expand & Play

Minister of State for Home Ajay Mishra Teni assesses the importance of the citizens of India in terms of dog and penny.

The minister has cost himself two pennies by telling farmer leader Rakesh Tikait, it is difficult to understand anyone for two pennies unless you are priceless.

Although everyone is equal in the constitution, but in the linguistic thinking of the minister, it seems that there is some other constitution.

He is being criticized for a year, there is a demand for his resignation, but even after this, the kind of language minister Ajay Mishra is speaking,

From this it seems that they have constitutional protection to speak an unconstitutional language.

We also know that he has popular support in Lakhimpur Kheri and the voters there won all the eight seats in the UP elections by voting for BJP.

Due to this enthusiasm of victory, their language is that of that old Ajay Mishra, about whom he was talking about reminding that understand what they were before MPs and MLAs, you should also remember the same first. 

“We will reform AAP within 2 minutes.. I am not only a minister, I am not an MP, I am an MLA.

Those who know about me before becoming an MP, will also know that I do not run away from any challenge and the day I started working after accepting that challenge, I would have to leave it till Lakhimpur not Ballia. .."

Before talking further it is important to remember that what Ajay Mishra was before MP MLA, it seems that he is proving it too.

I think this thing should always be remembered.

Ajay Mishra said that what the MP was before the MLA, remember, what effect would this have on Prabhat Gupta's family?

In 2000, there was a BJP government in UP, the Chief Minister was Ram Prakash Gupta.

Panchayat elections were being held in UP that year.

Ajay Mishra also wanted to contest the seat for which Prabhat Gupta was a contender.

Then that seat was reserved and both started supporting their respective candidates.

Prabhat Gupta was assassinated on 8 July 2000. 

Ajay Mishra was also arrested in this case but was later acquitted by the lower court.

Right now it is in the High Court. 

The hearing, which has been postponed several times, will now be held on September 6.

Ajay Mishra tells Rakesh Tikait for two pennies on the same day the date of hearing of his case in Lucknow court is postponed.

Should Prabhat Gupta's family be asked what the minister was like, or the journalists who had gone to ask questions to the minister. The minister only reminds that apart from what they were, it is also important to remember what they were at this time. Huh. 

Something will happen that their attitude does not decrease.

By telling Rakesh Tikait of two pennies, he has again told that he is a lot even today.

Before telling Rakesh Tikait of two koda, he has disrespected the feelings of dogs by narrating the incident of dog.

Now the dogs will not be able to speak, but those who care for them will feel bad, who lovingly keep a dog in their house. They caress like a child and also arranges food to warm clothes for the street dogs. Ajay Mishra mistake Know what a wonderful salute was given by the BSF dog to his cabinet minister Amit Shah.

Rather, in official terminology, it is addressed as a dog. 

How respectfully this dog welcomes Home Minister Amit Shah with a bouquet of flowers.

He salutes by bowing at his feet.

After that the skill of trained dogs of BSF was also displayed.

Can any minister make fun of the dog after seeing these dogs, BSF comes under his own department, his center comes, where dogs are trained for rescue work from terrorism to rescue and minister Ajay Mishra makes such remarks about dogs.

On August 15 this year, the Army honored a dog named Bajaj.

Bajaj played an important role in the operation against the terrorists in Baramulla. 

Political battle is between two humans, not between dogs.

Dogs are very cute human beings.

Dogs are kept in the homes of countless supporters and leaders of his own party.

They all must have felt bad.

People keep a dog very fondly and take care of it like a child.

Those who clapping on Ajay Mishra's statement also know this, but only when the minister tells a bad joke, he has to laugh.

Clappers always remember this. 

Rakesh Tikait did well, did not give importance to this statement, said that the son of the minister is in jail, so he is angry.

In Lakhimpur Kheri, a murder case is going on against the minister's son Ashish Mishra.

In this case, the witnesses have expressed apprehension of danger, Tikait has also said that their fear will have to be removed by running a campaign there.

This language of Minister of State for Home Ajay Mishra is not a slippery language.

When Prateek Srivastava spoke to the District President of Bharatiya Janata Party Yuva Morcha. Ram Pandey spoke of action and said that more such language is yet to come. 

Obviously language is a part of thinking, not a slippery one. Should the time be wasted by asking why the prime minister doesn't speak on Ajay Mishra's language, or should instead ask why the rape and murder accused should be released? But why were they welcomed with garlands, why were they released prematurely?

What would you think about those who garlanded Bipin Chandra Joshi, Shailesh Bhatt, Radheshyam Shah, Bakabhai Vohaniya, Kesharbhai Vohaniya, Jaswant, Govind, Pradeep Mordhia, Rajubhai Soni, Mitesh Bhatt and Ramesh Chandana, they were released on 15th August. It was done on the day the Prime Minister was appealing to the country that all the bad thoughts towards women have to be removed from the mind.

Freedom from words that degrade women is water.

But the way the joint family is gathered here to welcome them, and they are photographing wearing garlands, it is obvious that a large part of the society considers them to be part of the joint family, that is why women are putting them up.

This part of the Prime Minister's speech of that day was less in the public's eyes but it did not matter.

“A capital of the joint family, the system of family that has developed due to the sacrifices made by our mothers and sisters over the centuries is our legacy.

How can we be proud of this heritage?

We are those people who see Shiva in the soul.

We are those people who see Narayan in man.

We are the people who call Nari ka Narayani."

We are the ones who call Nar ka Narayan and women as Narayani, as the Prime Minister says, but what do those who garland rape convicts, we will see this question by asking this question in the WhatsApp group of the housing society, only this much can be done. are for the country.

Today Roop Rekha Verma, Revathi Lol and Subhasini Ali have filed a petition in the Supreme Court and demanded that the matter be heard.

Kapil Sibal is advocating all three. 

The petition has demanded that those who have been released should be sent back to jail.

Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has also filed a petition in the Supreme Court in this matter.

Mahula's PIL states that the victim has legitimate apprehensions about the safety of herself and her family members. The practice is not. It said that the premature release of all the 11 convicts on the same day clearly indicates that the state government has mechanically "bulk" without considering each individual case on merits. given release.

A press conference of United Against Justice and Discrimination was held in Mumbai today in support of the Bilkis Bans.

It was attended by its Chief Convenor Retired Justice Abhay Thipsay and Retired Justice Umesh Salvi.

Justice Salvi has also been the chairman of the National Green Tribunal. Senior advocate Gayatri Singh, Dr. Vivek Korde of Fundamental Rights Sangharsh Samiti and Maulana Dr. Mahmood Daryabdi of All India Ulema Council participated.

All these have raised questions on the decision to give amnesty to the convicts in rape and murder cases.

Many people are asking why people are not speaking on this matter, the whole of Delhi had gathered in front of Nirbhaya, perhaps in the case of Bilkis, the answer is being given to the question whether Delhi had gathered in front of Nirbhaya or something else happened. ?

It would also be wrong to dismiss the Nirbhaya movement by the silence of the people at the time of Bilkis. 

The people of that time were right which had reached the Raisina Hills, any society must come forward on the incident of rape, especially in a country where women are worshiped as goddess. Many people who believed at that time. Were that wrong had happened and it should be stopped now, he played his part, questioned the government and faced police lathis and water cannons.

The government also respected the sentiments of the public and formed a committee under the chairmanship of Justice Verma that what reforms should be made in the law so that there should be a change in the mindset of rape,

Create fear among criminals.

In a short time, this Justice Verma Committee gave its report and amendments were made in the law.

There will of course be flaws in this process but you cannot deny the movement of the protesting society reaching Raisina Hills.

He secured the Nirbhaya Fund to help the victim in rape cases.

After this, how many women came forward and did the case.

The false bond of social shame was broken. An expectation arose that action would be taken in such cases. 

It would not be right to dismiss the Nirbhaya movement.

At the time of Nirbhaya, there was no Godi media, which used to serve the government leaving the victim and her mother alone, was involved in bringing such issues, that Nirbhaya would not be discussed, that Godi media also used to do journalism, so from the incident of Nirbhaya All the related information used to run on the channels, there were many programs on all the channels simultaneously.

The public was seeing that the journalists were not lifting the shoes of the government but fighting for the justice of the victim.

Now it is Godi Media. Every anchor of Godi Media has seen this picture by their owners, that these culprits who raped Bilkis and slammed her baby girl are being welcomed with flower garlands. Now Godi Media Nirbhaya Doesn't question the silence of the Prime Minister like in the past.

Rather, it silences the public and changes the issues to divert their attention. 

This difference has come from the Nirbhaya movement till now.

There is one more difference.

Whats App Group of Resident Welfare Association, Retired Uncle and Housing Society.

Now whatever be the truth, the people associated with it believe in the one who comes forward in the group.

Their job is to silence the questioners or to create such an environment that people within the housing society do not dare to question.

This was not during Nirbhaya's time.

The public was the public and not the slave of WhatsApp group and Godi media.

Third but first this should have happened, there was a big change, after 2014 came the politics of standing on the basis of religion with the victim accused of rape.

In this context, the Kathua rape case of Jammu in January 2018 drew a big line.

All the accused who raped, stoned and killed the eight-year-old girl were Hindus, so Hindu Ekta Manch took out a yatra with the tricolor in favor of the accused, in this tricolor yatra two ministers of the same party participated. This time the tallest leader of the BJP gave the slogan of 'Tiranga Yatra' from door to door.

In the Mehbooba Mufti government, two BJP ministers, Chandra Prakash Ganga and Chaudhary Lal Singh, participate in this tricolor yatra.

When questions arose, both the ministers resigned from the post.

People forgot that the eight-year-old girl was raped in the temple, where she was given drug pills, where the priest of the temple, Sanjhi Ram, raped the eight-year-old girl.

His nephew was involved in that.

The police also knew in advance, rather the police officer was accused of informing the priest Sanjhi Ram about the drug pill.

This incident turns into Hindu vs Muslim,

Out of this, the eight-year-old girl who was raped by the priest, raped and killed in the temple goes missing.

When the chargesheet in this case was prepared, the lawyers also tried to prevent him from appearing.

People had become addicted to religion.

Those who had become fearless in the name of Nirbhaya had become shameless, are shameless till date.

In June 2019, six accused in this case were sentenced to several years for rape and murder. 

Since then, the same thing happened in every other case, when the accused were Muslims, then the case was made and those who kept silent were abused. There was a demand for hanging.

In the case of rape, the politics of Hindu Muslim became cruel.

He didn't want justice for the victim, he wanted respect for his communal whims.

This craze of the mob takes a second turn in Hyderabad. In the case of rape and murder, the encounter person showers flowers on the police, later the encounter turns out to be fake.

So this society will not speak at the time of Bilkis. It has supported many crimes, now it cannot fight for the justice of others.

If you just remember that the tricolor yatra was taken out in favor of the rape accused in the Kathua rape case, then you will not reject the Nirbhaya movement again and again.

The girl of Kathua got justice from the law but got justice from the society or the society remained with the rapist, I do not have the answer to this question.

But here you can see with whom the society is, the people who have put flower garlands around their neck, from which society they come, you can see, at the time of Kathua, Prime Minister Modi also issued a statement condemning it.13 In a tweet by the Prime Minister's Office in April 2018, Prime Minister Modi has said that the kind of incidents we have seen in the past, they challenge the concept of social justice.

The incidents which are in discussion for the last 2 days are definitely shameful for any civilized society.

As a society, as a country we are all ashamed of this.

We don't know whether the society that released these convicts who raped Bilkis, killed her child, killed relatives including the mother is civilized or not, whether the garland society is civilized or not, we know that You cannot discuss this type of discussion in the whats app group of your housing society.

During Kathua, when BJP ministers went to a rally in favor of the rape accused, there was a lot of criticism, and due to this, both the ministers had to resign.

But isn't this the subject of Home Minister Amit Shah, shouldn't the Prime Minister have spoken on it?

Then why were you speaking on Kathua?

You will read the judgment of Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa and Justice Vinod S Bhardwaj of Jammu and Kashmir High Court in the Kathua rape case.