One of the most famous anthropologists in the world, the Frenchman Claude Levi-Strauss, in his book "Sad Tropics", singled out as a characteristic of many societies, the "tendency" of the human mind to often make binary distinctions: i bad – good, beautiful – ugly, valuable – worthless.

These binary differences, according to Stossi, but also according to the philosopher Michel Foucault, are made on purpose by the debaters mostly for the domination and subjugation of the other who is culturally different from him.

Even in the case of the headscarf debate, which started in Pristina and moved to Tirana and Skopje, this binary tendency, to introduce Muslims into the territory of inferiority, has been perhaps the most essential problem of the debaters, especially in social networks.

First of all, I have to say that in all these years that this repeated debate has been raging about whether or not to wear the headscarf in public institutions, the destination seems to have been not at all concern for the other, but the desire to attempt a cultural superiority.

Such a tendency has simply attempted a ghettoization or subjugation of the one who sees the world differently and who does not want to be a hostage of the spectacle, of fashion.

Even the colors of the debate on the scarf and the beard, interwoven with baklava, kadaif and balloons, are not missing either, as if a man removes his beard and scarf and eats tiramisu or cheese instead of baklava, he immediately becomes wiser, he gets the right look for it the world!

A banal and insidious trick by debaters is to shift the discussion with slogans such as: "We are like Europe", or "our future is the West", and that "we are Westerners and not Orientals", although many of them do not would know how to explain where such definitions came from and what these concepts mean.

These debaters even line up their arguments without even admitting that these societies that they exemplify for their ideas have solved these issues by avoiding the prejudice of how one knows how to dress in their everyday life even though Muslims are immigrants in these countries that they take as an example.

While in our Albanian lands this debate is deliberately distorted, trying more and more not to seek a solution in respect of the other's faith,

But how is it possible that none of the opponents of wearing the headscarf can prove that if you dress or undress like them, you directly take on another citizen, cover you with a wisdom and security for life and that you understand the other better?

Or is this whole debate essentially relegating faith communities to the fringes of society so that only spectacle and vanity reign?

Meanwhile, we must affirm that Muslims themselves should not avoid the responsibility for dialogue in public, to show the members of the society where they live the essence of what they believe, so that they are not simply the object of negative news.

Those who lead the bureaucratic life of the community of believers, in Pristina, Tirana and Skopje, bear the responsibility to explain the values ​​of what the headscarf represents or the many rules that believers follow in their daily lives.

They must explain that democracy does not conflict with faith, but especially with the duty to seek knowledge.

Believers themselves know how important it is to win the battle in society by arguing with others, by showing values ​​in coexistence with others, and not by isolating and cowering in solitude that is already abundantly offered to them by designers and suggesters. of inferior territories for believers.

Only the Albanian Muslims have it in their hands not to allow the dangerous ghettos of the territory of inferiority to be built against them, which can be at least a social burden for society, or a malicious argument against those who wish to see the believers as bad painting, which we cannot expose in our journey as a society.

And taking a cue from this debate, we must affirm that in this unstoppable process of cultural interaction, we must worry that we are supporting a hypocritical society, a society that has lost its nerve to punish the unjust, the thief and the strong. that seeks to defy the law.

We have to worry that today's generation in schools is a functional illiterate, who no longer has respect for the honest, who does not worry about how to be honest, but who is intent on how to get rich in a day and how to be in the daily circle of fame.

And in this journey, undressing does not help you, just as it is not a guarantee that by putting on the headscarf you have gained the legitimacy of a citizen responsible for yourself and then also for the community where you live.