Ind vs Eng: The entire cricket world is praising Rohit's captaincy, but the former England international has a different thinking.

It seems that the former greats of England are not able to digest the 4-1 defeat suffered by India at all.

Instead of praising India, he has started speaking just the opposite.

In this episode, former England op-spinner Graeme Swann has targeted Indian captain Rohit Sharma.

The former offie said that Rohit's captaincy in the five-Test series was not better than that of Ben Stokes, but his bowlers did wonders.

And because of this, India was successful in winning the series 4-1.

Stokes' leadership style caught everyone's attention from the beginning to the end of the series, but the Rohit-led Indian team was successful in winning four consecutive matches and winning the series by a huge margin.

Also read:

Indian batsmen created a stir, made a mega record, this happened for the first time in 92 years

Swann said, 'I don't think he was better as a captain because his bowlers bowled amazingly.

He had good firepower.

He said, 'Don't get me wrong, Rohit Sharma is a good captain, but I believe that if you say in this context that Stokes captained poorly, then I think you are wrong.'

Swann said, 'Rohit Sharma's bowlers bowled really amazing.

He could not play in the first match but in the last four matches he made the captain's job easier by bowling brilliantly.

England's aggressive 'baseball' style of play did not work in this series, but Swann believes that Stokes' team could not play the kind of cricket that had brought them success recently.

He said, 'I think England's weakness in this series was that they could not play adventurous cricket.

I believe that he could not play the kind of cricket that you people in the media call 'baseball'.